Episode 43

Anton Nel

Sun, 20 Jun 2021  ·  00:30:24  ·  Transcript available

On this week's INTERPLAY, the great pianist Anton Nel discusses the master teacher's life during the Pandemic and his hopes for the future as a performing artist. His insights into piano literature, approaches to study, and his favorite works are illuminating. A wonderful talk with a wondrous intelligence and wit.

Find out more at www.michaelshapiro.com

Anton's website: www.antonnel.com

Transcript

Michael Shapiro:
Welcome to Interplay: Conversations in Music. This is Michael Shapiro, your host. Today, I am blessed to have, straight from Austin, Texas, Anton Nel, pianist extraordinaire. Thank you for joining us on Interplay.
Anton Nel:
It's a pleasure to be with you, Michael. Thank you.
Michael Shapiro:
Thank you so much, Anton. Now, you know, if you read your biography—which is available on your website—it talks about a career spent in love with music. A career that is based, in my mind, in what a musician's musician is. The presentation, let us say, of music and looking for the essence of what is in every piece.I first encountered your playing, actually, fairly recently in a YouTube version of the Egyptian Concerto of our friend in common, Camille Saint-Saëns.
Anton Nel:
Oh my gosh! [Laughs]
Michael Shapiro:
You know, I've been to his grave—the family grave in Montparnasse. It's not in great shape, that little tomb of his. And it's amazing that he's even in there, because of the size of what he was. But, um, yeah, it's not doing so well in Montparnasse. Conversely, some very good restaurants I might add!But at any event, when I heard the Egyptian, I said, "Oh my heavens, what an absolute, incredible pianist!" So let's talk about—because I'm a pianist in my background, although I'm a practicing composer—when you approach a piece, let us say it's the Egyptian of Saint-Saëns, the Fifth Piano Concerto, can you describe to people, what's your process? I know that you are very much a virtuoso of many of the concerti of Saint-Saëns. But let's say just the Egyptian, which is a very unusual piece. What was your process in starting the occasion of playing that piece?
Anton Nel:
Well, with a piece like that, of course, it's something that I had heard before, and that's what attracted me to it. I had heard of it, and then I heard it. And, you know, subsequently when I was asked to play it, of course, this was very, very, very exciting.So it is something that is in my ear, which I would—I think when you've heard it before, you approach it differently than when you learn something that you have never heard or don't know. Right. So, basically, for me, when I learn a piece, I do a lot of reading of it first. Even if it's very rough, just to get a basic idea to lay out immediately what the challenges are, both artistically and technically.And in that case, of course, it's a compendium of virtuoso exercises. So you practice those sort of separately. A lot of it—the last movement, for example, is sort of like an étude. But then, when you get into it, it is something I find that is so colorful and so exotic. And, um, there's a certain sound world that you have to go into, that you have to cultivate when you work on it.Because I feel that when you play something like that, of course, it's going to sound flashy and amazing anyway, but I think it has such a big artistic component that you have to bring forth, plus this whole sort of exotic atmosphere. I mean, he composed it in Egypt, for crying out loud, so you have to. [Laughs] You know? So that—it's an interesting—I mean, it's like a giant character piece. And when you get into the second movement where he uses those wonderful scales and, you know, some, you know, song that is sung by the boatman on the Nile, etc., etc. It's—it's fun. I love the process of learning it, even though it can be frustrating at times because it is so difficult.But of course, with Saint-Saëns being who he is, I mean, he was a genius when he wrote for the piano, so, um, the rewards are terrific. I mean, you practice it and it does stick, you know, sort of like Liszt or Debussy or Chopin. It does—it sticks well. It's a pleasure to play that.
Michael Shapiro:
Well, he obviously knew, in the hand, what to do. Now we'll shift to Schubert, for example. I know you play the Impromptus splendidly, for example, in my experience. Here was a different person, obviously. Saint-Saëns had a long life. Aaron Copland even met him in Boulanger's soiree one night, Aaron told me, years ago.
Anton Nel:
Wow.
Michael Shapiro:
When he was a kid. Wow. And right at the end of Saint-Saëns' life, which is fascinating. Saint-Saëns obviously heard The Rite of Spring—famous story. But, you know, doing the Egyptian, you have this cosmopolitan person in Saint-Saëns. Wrote it in Egypt, I think he died in North Africa.
Anton Nel:
Yes, in Algiers, maybe.
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah, yeah. He loved to travel. So in any event, but we talk about Schubert, who basically lived in one place, right?
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Never even went up to Beethoven, although he could have. Was too shy. Had a small group of friends. Sometimes slept with his glasses so he could compose immediately when he got up! So says the stories.
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
But you look at the Schubert pieces—different style. So let's talk about him as a transitional composer. What is your process there?
Anton Nel:
Oh gosh, well with Schubert, I mean he's one of these people that—when I teach Schubert, for example, that's—this is a good—would be a good thing to say because I approach Schubert sort of like I teach him to my students.
Michael Shapiro:
Understood.
Anton Nel:
I mean, for me, everything in him is related to song. So for me, when I study a Schubert piece, even if I—even if I know it, I go back and listen to, you know, as many songs as I can lay my hands on. I love the chamber music. I love listening to the string quartets, um, you know, some of the symphonic music, Rosamunde, all of these things. I—and this I do pretty much with every composer—I mean, I immerse myself in the music of this composer, often not piano, because, I mean, when Schubert wrote for the piano, I mean, it's—of course, he wrote beautifully for the instrument, but so much of it...What I like the best about Schubert—and this is, you know, in absolutely everything he wrote—is he will—he'll write a phrase and you'll go, "That's really beautiful." And then, in the next phrase, it'll be the same thing, but he might alter one note in it, and suddenly the entire emotional content of the phrase is turned around. And just like in his songs, you know, he'll write the same phrase, and in the first—in the first phrase, he might use the word "life," and then "death" in the next one. And it's just—it is just astonishing to me. And so for me, exploring that...Of course, what—what I—you may know this, but—but in recent—oh, in the past 10 or 15 years, I've been doing a lot of playing on historic instruments. So I've gotten to know a lot of these instruments that this music was—was—was written for during the time. So, and that changes a lot of, um, decisions that I make when I do the interpretive, artistic side of it. Um, you know, how I voice, how I pedal, how I articulate, how I read it, how I read the score. All of that is now—I'm—I'm so much more informed than I ever was, and I think that contributes a lot.But with Schubert, above all, it is this, um, you know, it is this world that is—well, [Laughs] it's just—it's just—it's just amazing to me. I mean, he's one of these people where I, you know, I'm always in awe of how a human could create what he did, and so much of it.
Michael Shapiro:
In such a short time! Even shorter than this fellow over my...
Anton Nel:
I see him, yes! Yeah, well, you know, he might have known—you know, I don't know, these people knew, I mean they—they didn't have long, but it is amazing to me. I—I am always playing Schubert, and I think I have five students at the moment playing Schubert sonatas, so I am immersed on a daily—daily, daily basis.
Michael Shapiro:
Well, what you just spoke about, Anton Nel, was the—the conversation in his songs between life and death, which is often something which he may have been thinking about. Maybe he knew he was sick from venereal disease, we don't know. You know, we know so little about him. It's—I think it's even less than we know about Bach, for example. It's a tiny, tiny bit.
Anton Nel:
Yes. But the music explains a lot.
Michael Shapiro:
Well, all right, so let's talk about major and minor.
Anton Nel:
Okay.
Michael Shapiro:
And modulation.
Anton Nel:
Okay.
Michael Shapiro:
Which I love to do in my own music now. I shift all the time for dramatic purposes. You can write about death in major keys.
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Which he does. Schubert certainly does, doesn't he?
Anton Nel:
He does.
Michael Shapiro:
Now let's shift to this guy. I just read—this guy, this little Amadeus behind my shoulder.
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Which you certainly do play. You play the concerti, you play the sonatas, you play the chamber music.
Anton Nel:
Everything, yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Everything, and you've grown up with him. Different kind of style completely. Jan Swafford recently, who's been on Interplay, talked about this, about his new book about—about Mozart.
Anton Nel:
Mm.
Michael Shapiro:
You know, and he talks about how the Mozart period was a period of love that Mozart gave. He also speaks about "tunesmithing," which is very important to me as a composer, I have to say, because I think the composers who last are the great melody writers, of no matter what period. And if they don't have great melody, then you're looking for some other thing, you know? And we can point to examples now or in—in history.What makes Schubert's melodies ring so true for you in our ears?
Anton Nel:
Gosh.
Michael Shapiro:
Still staying with Schubert.
Anton Nel:
Well, that's so interesting. I mean, and I think—I think Mozart has this—has the same sort of thing. Same thing. It's something—it's interesting, I had this chat with a friend of mine the other day. I have a—a friend who comes over every couple of weeks and we actually—we play a lot of Schubert piano duets together, and we were—we were marveling at this thing, because—and we were saying the same thing, "So what is it about this that is so beautiful?" And we decided that it's the fact that it is something that is so simple, but at the same time so expressive, all at the same time. And we sort of decided, you know, after a few glasses of wine, that—that greatness can really be defined as a person who can perform miracles with almost nothing.
Michael Shapiro:
That's great.
Anton Nel:
So that it's not this—because with him—with him and like with Mozart, I mean, there is never an excess. But the—the, you know, you can play something and no matter—or sing something or, no matter what the level of sophistication of the listener, they are touched by this without knowing why.
Michael Shapiro:
I love that. Now Beethoven and Haydn.
Anton Nel:
Oh, yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Different, different, different. Beethoven struggled deeply, we know this from the books that have lasted, you know, the—the, uh, his workbooks. He struggled deeply with writing a melodic line, while I think it was very, very easy for Mozart and Schubert. That's my opinion. And this is true throughout history. I mean, if you look at Gershwin, for example, melody was so easy for him.
Anton Nel:
Definitely.
Michael Shapiro:
And he worried about a lot of—I know you play, you play the Gershwin, uh, piano works. You know, if you look at the tunesmiths in history, it just flows. And then there's others who can create great stuff, but they really have to work at it. Jerome Kern, they used to say, by the way, would pick out individual notes and keep keep on jumping up and down the 12 notes until he hit the right one, which I find interesting for somebody who really had to work at it. While there's others like Richard Rodgers or Gershwin where it just—it just came out, to use recent tunesmiths, you know, for 100 years ago.
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
Do you feel technically—because you're a teacher of piano for many years at UT Austin and other places, you do a lot of masterclasses—do you feel that there is a position of the hand, or the use of the fingers, which differs work to work? Or is it pretty much steady, composer to composer, as far as hand position and finger usage?
Anton Nel:
It varies a lot. It varies a lot. Um, it's just—just on a sort of a—I'll try to explain it on a very basic kind of level. Because there are—or or there used to be, I don't think so much anymore, but there used to be sort of different schools of piano playing, you know, like the so-called Russian school and the so-called French school, and then the sort of the German, you know, the Schnabel, whatever school. They—and they all sort of held their hands in a slightly different way. Um, but the basic—and the—and I teach this way too.Um, my teacher in South Africa, by the way, was a Leschetizky student who studied with Liszt, and my teacher knew Debussy and Ravel and Britten and, you know, heard Rachmaninoff. He had all these peo—I mean, I was a very lucky person. He made the first—he made the first ever long-playing records on Decca of the Debussy Études and played the world premiere of the Hindemith Piano Concerto under John Barbirolli. I mean, this is the kind of—where—where I come from. But he—but he had a very basic way of teaching.
Michael Shapiro:
His name, please.
Anton Nel:
His name is Adolph Hallis, H-A-L-L-I-S. And you can find some of him on YouTube still. I mean, I studied with him between the ages of about, um, 13 and 20. It was—it was a very significant part of my life.
Michael Shapiro:
Wonderful.
Anton Nel:
You know, in a—he had—I had music in my hand, you know, with Ravel's handwriting in it. You know, I played, you know, Gaspard de la nuit and he would say, "Well, Ravel said..." [Shapiro laughs] You know? Or—or my teacher said, "Liszt said." Okay. So this was awesome!But, um, just to get back to the technical aspect, that was where I was taught, um, when—this sort of sounds like mumbo jumbo to the average person, but it's really important because, I mean, the basic way a sound on the piano is produced is, I mean, you press a key down, a hammer hits a string and the sound comes out. I mean, that is the thing.But then we are these con artists who give the impression that we actually can connect things together, make sounds sing, play legato—this is all nonsense! But we create the illusion that this happens, and it's by this super-fine gradations, in other words, the speed that the hammer hits the key, from one note to the next, and how much you space, how they're connected, how they're graded—it's so fine. I mean, that's the whole art of piano playing, it's right there.And the way you vary the speed of the—of the key is, of course, with the most immediate attack would be with a curved finger, so you—if you do that with on the—on the tip, it'll be the quickest attack. So you can use that for brilliant, articulate, and things like that. But the—but the flatter you get, the slighter delay, because it's not quite as quick here, so it's in a tiny bit a little slower. So that's why you see a lot of people, for example, play—say—say you—say you watch Horowitz, for example, play...
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah, I wanted to ask you about him.
Anton Nel:
He played—he played with very flat fingers. And a lot of that got that very specific sound. It was his sort of way of playing cantabile, which, um, slight del—slight delays of the—of the hammer hitting the string. So all of that, people do that a lot. You know, some people, uh, you know, the—the old French school played slightly flat, but with very high kind of fingers, which I— doesn't work for me, but, um, because—but—but whatever you—uh, whatever you do, uh, or try to do to—to bring the music to life, of course, is the thing. But that's a very basic principle. It—you—you change—you change around a lot. And of course, when you play—when you play on early instruments where the keys are short, you—you automatically play very much with more curved fingers because, you know, other—unless you can sort of go on the Jenny Craig diet and make your hand smaller! [Shapiro laughs] It's just— It's amazing. It's fascinating, really, fascinating.
Michael Shapiro:
I have very big hands. I have, like, a huge hand. And...
Anton Nel:
Yes, I can imagine.
Michael Shapiro:
...I—I cannot play Mozart well. I never have been able to.
Anton Nel:
Are you sure?
Michael Shapiro:
I don't know.
Anton Nel:
Are you sure? No, it's...
Michael Shapiro:
But my Brahms—Brahms and Schumann, I feel I can play much more easily.
Anton Nel:
Well, I—I—I think that...
Michael Shapiro:
I need you as my teacher! [Laughs]
Anton Nel:
Oh, well, we—well, we can Zoom! This is very fashionable, you know. [Shapiro laughs] No, but—but I mean, all of that stuff, um, of course, the less notes there are in the score, the harder it gets. So, I mean, I, you know, playing Bach and Mozart well is—it's so rewarding, but it's—it's super challenging for everybody.
Michael Shapiro:
Anton Nel, talk to us about the keyboard instruments behind you, because we have obviously a piano forte, conventional, black—it may be a Steinway, I would think, or Yamaha.
Anton Nel:
It is.
Michael Shapiro:
The Steinway. But talk—what is the other instrument?
Anton Nel:
Oh, it's something that I love. Normally there are three instruments here, but the other one is is has a—is out for a visit. That is—that is a fortepiano.
Michael Shapiro:
Ah.
Anton Nel:
Um, which is—which is an instrument I play very serious—seriously, and I love. That is—that is a copy of a Viennese instrument from the 1790s. It's a five-octave instrument. Um, it's something that Haydn would have had. Mozart and Beethoven certainly would have played on something like that. Um, I play a lot...
Michael Shapiro:
Who was—who was the maker? I'm sorry, who is the maker in Vienna?
Anton Nel:
Oh, excuse me. The maker of this instrument is—his—he's a man called Robert Smith, who's from Massachusetts. Um, he—probably the most famous fortepiano maker in the world now is a man called Paul—Paul McNulty, who—who lives in—who lives in the Czech Republic. But—but he apprenticed with this guy, so this was—is like a cousin. So, um, it's a replica of an instrument by a guy called Könicke, which is sort of with Walter and Stein. Um, it's in that league, and that was very, very fashionable in the late 1700s. And pretty soon after this one, the range, of course, expanded. This is only five octaves, but you can play everything up until, you know, middle Beethoven on it. It's marvelous.
Michael Shapiro:
So you can do Beethoven Opus 1, but, uh, you're not going to do the, uh, the Waldstein or...
Anton Nel:
It—you can play the Waldstein on it, although it—it—the Waldstein only goes up to the G there, but the Waldstein wasn't written for a Viennese instrument. Beethoven got an Erard, and that was what it was written for, so you shouldn't play it on there. But this is especially good for things like Haydn and C.P.E. Bach. Amazing.
Michael Shapiro:
I didn't realize he got—I—I remember him getting a—a British instrument, I didn't know about the Erard, that's fascinating.
Anton Nel:
He did! He did, and he—he was, you know, of course, and he was a tough customer. He liked it up to a point, and I think that instrument inspired him, especially the, you know, with the special pedal things in the Waldstein, um, was inspired by that instrument. But pretty soon he got dissatisfied with it. Um, but it's—but it's interesting, it's something that I was not so aware of until recently. There's some excellent articles about it.
Michael Shapiro:
Didn't Ravel, uh, play and compose on an Erard?
Anton Nel:
P—possibly, or a Pleyel, um...
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah. No, I think it's an Erard, because I—I was—I've been to his house...
Anton Nel:
Wow.
Michael Shapiro:
...in Le Belvédère in Montfort-l'Amaury, in outside of Paris. And there's an Erard there, and I played Le Tombeau de Couperin on it.
Anton Nel:
Oh my gosh.
Michael Shapiro:
And he composed on that piano, the two piano concertos—the Left Hand and then the G major. It was very interesting because when I spoke to the woman there who was the docent, Madame Moreau, she said that an old man, until very recently, passed away, when he was a little boy, was—lived nearby and heard Ravel composing the two concertos. It was a tiny town, you know?
Anton Nel:
Isn't that amazing?
Michael Shapiro:
Le Belvédère, yeah, it's fabulous. Um, we've talked about various composers and your approach. But there is something that is wonderful about your playing. There are pianists who are pianists, and then when they appear with orchestra, they often do not know what to do. I've had that experience as a conductor, without naming names. And then there are pianists who've—who've done chamber music, who've done a good deal of concerti, and also have so—done solo work, like you. You've been in all three realms, apart from the whole professor of piano at UT Austin thing. Don't you think that your chamber music playing—and you've done the complete chamber music literature—don't you think that's—that informs everything that you do? And also, you've accompanied singers, too.
Anton Nel:
Yeah. Oh, absolutely. I, um...
Michael Shapiro:
And how? And how, Anton? Tell me how.
Anton Nel:
When you play chamber music, it makes you listen on a totally different level. I think if you only play solo music, you—you develop a whole—you're sort of—it's kind of egocentric. I mean, you, you know, it's only you, you, you all the time. Right. But when you play—when you play with—and I was lucky enough to do this from an early age, I have always—it's always been my first love. I don't think there is anything that I enjoy more than to play chamber music with good people.
Michael Shapiro:
Right.
Anton Nel:
And over the years, you know, I encountered these fantastic people that I play with, who, I mean, it's so enriching because you—they actually have the ability to make you sound better than you actually are. And, you know, and when you come back and play on your own, you don't think just piano anymore. I—I—I say this to my students often, too. I mean, and it's kind of—it's a fairly shocking thing to say, but—but it's really true. I mean, I—I mean, I like the piano, you know, of course, fine, but I love music. There's a difference. [Shapiro laughs] That—because for me, it's about the love of music, it's not about playing the piano, because that's just a small part of the whole thing.So when you play with orchestra, no matter whether it's—it can be the grandest and the biggest thing, it is still chamber music, whether—whether you're playing a Mozart concerto or the Rachmaninoff Third, it is the same.
Michael Shapiro:
It is. It is. There's no question about it, and that is when I enjoy working with a pianist as a conductor the most—when that person has been through that regimen and has enjoyed it. Um, to finish some of our talk, and this has just been so beautiful to talk to you about Schubert, your love of music, it is so true that in the playing of Anton Nel, your love of music—of—of all kinds comes through. And the experience you've had in chamber music certainly enriches the piano playing that you've got, uh, as a soloist.One thing I've noticed about some musicians is that some are athletes, but not necessarily great musicians. They have great athletic—I mean, it's like great basketball players, but they're not leading, you know, they're taking the shots, but they're not leading the team to a win, to use, you know, the difference between, uh, you know, two different basketball players. So it's very true of musicians, too, and it's something that I've noticed. So your focus on getting your students to do more chamber music, do more song recitals is going to—it has to lead to greater results, don't you think?
Anton Nel:
Of course. Of course. I mean, it is—it is that. I mean, for me, unfortunately—and I think we have technology to blame partly for it—you know, there is such an accent nowadays because of, you know, these perfect CDs and the recordings and things you hear, that—and and also, of course, competitions that are, you know, a dime a dozen. People tend to—there's such a tremendous focus on the technical side of it, and—and especially training—the training of young people.I mean, I'm all for, of course, developing physically as soon as you can because there—there comes a point where, you know, things do slow down and you can't do it.
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah.
Anton Nel:
But—but, for—but not at the cost of the other stuff. I mean, that was where I was so lucky as a young person because I was born with—I mean, I was a late starter. I didn't play on—I couldn't play until I was 10. But I was, you know, I was a natural sort of at the instrument. But my teacher nonetheless, there was a—there was a certain technical regime that I did do it, but the accent was never on that. I mean, lessons were—um, and I was challenged, too. I mean, as a teenager, and of course I wanted to play fast, but he was no... So I had, you know, things like the Mozart C minor Fantasy and the Rondo in A minor. I mean...
Michael Shapiro:
A minor.
Anton Nel:
Torture! For a 15-year-old, that is torture. Or slow preludes and fugues of Bach. You know, no pedal, you know, just— So, I am forever grateful, and you know, think— I mean, and I played, you know, big— I, the first time I played, you know, the Tchaikovsky Concerto, I was 15, for example. And I mean, I could manage—I could manage it, but he was—my teacher was always the least happy with the lyrical things. I could never play them quite to his satisfaction, and it was great because I was challenged in that way. So that was always first and foremost in my mind.
Michael Shapiro:
Now, we've lived through a very difficult period, um, we were discussing before we came on, you know, how we've basically been restricted and so many opportunities have passed.
Anton Nel:
Yes.
Michael Shapiro:
God willing, we're in a period where this world will be inoculated and this thing will be beaten. Thankfully, you and your loved ones were not exp—exposed as I was. [Nel laughs] But, we're alive, we're talking. So, I know what I've learned from this experience, what have you learned?
Anton Nel:
Well, it really was a very— [Laughs] it has been a fascinating time, actually. I mean, I—I have felt, um, well, I have felt so lucky that I've been able to, um, that I've been able to keep working, because so many of my friends have not been as lucky. I mean, of course, I lost a year's worth of concerts, but I had my—my university job continued and this lovely room that I'm in, I could use to teach in. I taught—I taught in person because my students could come here. Um, I feel so lucky because I could do a lot of—I've learned more about technology than I ever wanted to, but, you know, I've sort of become a producer! [Laughs]
Michael Shapiro:
Well, this show!
Anton Nel:
Because I've done so many of these bloody virtual—I am so sick of them. But I did many, and they were—and they were useful, and they were great. But, um, but you know what I also learned—I, you know, what I also learned: a lot of music. It was just fun. And I challenged myself to, um, I learned a lot of basic things that I've always wanted to do, but—but I also challenged myself to learn things out of my comfort zone. I mean, just this morning, this was a scream—you would like this—right before I came on with you, what was I practicing? Guajira duolina, David Baker, Arturo Márquez. Now, this is not music you would associate with me, right?
Michael Shapiro:
No.
Anton Nel:
But—but I learned all—so I did that, you know, and I learned, um, I learned some of the George Walker sonatas. I, um...
Michael Shapiro:
Good for you.
Anton Nel:
Oh, yeah. And—and so, you know, I—I did things like, I read through all of the Albéniz Iberia because I thought that I should know it. You know, I just—I...
Michael Shapiro:
I think you would be great in that music.
Anton Nel:
Oh, no, my hands are too fat. No, they're very— [Laughs] No, I sound horrible on it. But—but—but all of this stuff, I feel, you know, so I did a lot of things for my educational, um, thing. It was—it was nice. I mean, I... um, I—I—I don't—I enjoy being by myself, you know, so I immersed myself in a lot of things, um, I feel, um, I mean, certainly, I feel enriched in a certain way. But I also, you know, all of us, you know, this is not exactly what we signed up for.I've started to play—I've started to play some concerts for people again, and a—a couple of weeks ago—now a month now, sorry—I—I played my first real in-person concerts down with the San Antonio Symphony. I played the last Mozart concerto, which I picked specifically for this reason. And let me tell you something, that it was unbelievable. It was sort of like, um, a debut all over again. But you know, and everybody is so, you know, they—they—the hall is large, so they could let a few hundred...
Michael Shapiro:
It's a beautiful hall.
Anton Nel:
Ah, it's so beautiful. But you know, so you play and you don't know what, you know, it's just amazing. And—and you can't, you know, it's—and then at the end, of course, everybody is very appreciative and so on and so, and so I had to play an encore, and, uh, I was getting ready to announce it, you know? And I realized I couldn't speak. I was just completely a wreck. I just had to sit there for a minute, [Shapiro laughs] because the whole thing is overwhelming.
Michael Shapiro:
It is, it is. It's very emotional. It's like when—when we get our first vaccine shot, it's very emotional.
Anton Nel:
Yes, it is. Yes, it's true.
Michael Shapiro:
Anton Nel, all of us cannot wait to hear you in concert, live and together and enjoying life, because your playing is all about giving and all about life.
Anton Nel:
Thank you.
Michael Shapiro:
It is, and it is so deeply musical and personal. I cannot thank you enough, Anton Nel, great pianist, for being on Interplay.
Anton Nel:
Thank you so much, Michael, it's a pleasure.
Michael Shapiro:
Thank you very much, and thank you audience for watching Interplay: Conversations in Music this week with Anton Nel. I'm Michael Shapiro, your host.