Episode 64
Teddy Abrams
On this month's Interplay, Conversations in Music, I had the great pleasure of speaking with composer and conductor Teddy Abrams about his pathfinding work in Louisville and his new musical based on the life of Muhammad Ali. There is simply no one in classical music with greater depth of knowledge and with more intensity in seeking new and exciting ways of connecting with audiences. I just loved talking with him, and you will too!
Find out more at www.michaelshapiro.com
Transcript
Michael Shapiro:
This is Michael Shapiro. Welcome to Interplay: Conversations in Music. And I am delighted to have on Interplay today Teddy Abrams, composer and conductor of the Louisville Orchestra among many other places. Hi, Teddy.
Teddy Abrams:
Hello, how are you?
Michael Shapiro:
I'm great. And I'm so happy to be together with my landsman. So, Teddy, you came to Louisville after being assistant in Detroit, for example, and conducting elsewhere at a very young age. And you took over a Louisville Orchestra that, for me as a composer, had a history going back to when it would do recordings of a lot of new music and record those pieces, you know. I knew Louisville Orchestra and Whitney and all of those days for years. But when you took it over, it was—it needed some fresh words, some fresh involvement. You said recently in an interview that if an orchestra's got a name that is the name of the city that it's in, the conductor better be out there. So talk about that. How has this changed in the 10 years you've been there now in Louisville?
Teddy Abrams:
So, when I got to Louisville 10 years ago, there had been a real period of—of challenging situations that, that actually were the reasons that I was brought there in the first place. But the circumstances were, uh, a bankruptcy, and a strike, and work stoppage. I mean, basically all of the—the most, um, you know, upsetting and—and difficult, uh, circumstances that an orchestra could face. And they were just coming out of this period and—and had found a way to restore the orchestra and—and done that under some—some very severe, um, and—and dire circumstances. But they were up and playing by the time that I got there, but again with—with these really, um, significant restrictions and—and, and limitations and—and contractions. The orchestra had—had, um, shrunk in size and—and many players, uh, had—had left. Um, there'd been a void in—in artistic leadership, to—to say the least, for a—a—a very long time at that point. Um, and so, I was 25 when I got the job, uh, which is, you know, a—it's actually a—a good time to do something like that because you're—you're—you're just young enough, um, to—to be, well, somewhere between naive and quixotic and all these—
Michael Shapiro:
But I have a question. Quickly, when you got there, obviously you auditioned with the orchestra somehow?
Teddy Abrams:
Yes. Yeah, I was brought in for—for an audition, or—or actually it was—it was an initial reading session where I was just conducting the orchestra to see if there was any chemistry, uh, and then—then I was brought in to do an actual concert, um, a little while later.
Michael Shapiro:
Let's talk about chemistry, because I find this fascinating. When I conducted the BBC in the recording of my Archangel piano concerto, I was there for three days in—in Cardiff. The second day, when we were doing the piano concerto with Steven Beck, the great pianist, I felt as if my baton was—I was Harry Potter and the orchestra was Voldemort, in the sense that there was a bzzzz—the chemistry was so intensely good. You don't have that all the time. You can speak to that, don't you think?
Teddy Abrams:
Oh, yeah. Uh, I mean, and—and it can be developed. Also, it's just like any relationship between people. I mean, it take—sometimes takes some time for people to trust each other and—and find each other. Of course, in—in, in our profession, so much of the element of trust is—is built up in reputation, too, um, which is one of the really tough things about—about the—the art of conducting and about classical music and about symphonic organizations in general. That, if you are a conductor who is unknown, or even unknown to a specific orchestra, um, then you're—you're truly building from zero. Every single thing that you say and do is amplified and—and judged in a way that's very different than if you're coming in with a certain reputation and—and, uh, a—a respect, and a—, um, and—and perhaps just an understanding of who you are before you—you stand on the podium. And—and as a young conductor, you're hyper-aware of those sensitivities. And you're—you also are—are hyper-aware of the scrutiny and the—the magnifying glass that's—that's placed, uh, over you. But, and—and rightly so. I mean, you have to—you have to prove yourself and you have to navigate really tough waters. Remember that—that whether you're a young conductor or a very established conductor, if you're coming in to work with an orchestra, you're given the same schedule. You all have four rehearsals to go from the beginning of the week to the—the level of preparation needed to—to perform. And it doesn't matter. So, it doesn't matter if you've—you've, uh, you know, um, you—what, you've put out a gazillion recordings and are, are, you know, a world-famous conductor, or you've—you're doing this for the very first time. You have the same exact schedule, the same circumstances.
Michael Shapiro:
You know, Harold Farberman, who was my second conducting teacher, used to say that within a minute and a half the orchestra will either want to look at you, or they'll—will stop.
Teddy Abrams:
You feel that right away. Now—now, I have also been in situations where, over the course of a week, the, um—the relationship and the dynamic grows. Because a lot of it, too, is—is extra-musical. You know, much of the—the judgment process and the evaluation process from the orchestra, uh, that you're working with, i—is about who you are as—as a person, and—and as a musician. So, you have these—these competing things. You have like the, um, the element of charismatic leadership, you have the element of psychology, you have the element of pure musicianship. And those are three things that are separate from the—the physical act of conducting. And so, those—I would say those are the four, um, kind of components that—that build, uh, you know, a—a complete picture of who somebody is as a conductor.
Michael Shapiro:
But I would add there's something else. You're a very fine pianist, and I assume that over the years you've sat down and sight-read through Mozart sonatas, Haydn sonatas, Beethoven sonatas, Brahms pieces, Chopin, everybody, to Bartók and maybe later. You've sat and you've played piano.
Teddy Abrams:
Yeah.
Michael Shapiro:
So, and you've played in chamber music, and you've accompanied singers, and you've built your own vocal music. Do you think that your training outside of the conducting world, doing all of that musicianship—the building of your musical soul, as it were—phrasing, knowing how to deal with large structures, was formed before you even stood on a podium?
Teddy Abrams:
Oh, certainly. Uh, I—I, I mean, I think that conducting has to be an extension of who you are as a broader person and a broader musician. I mean, if conducting is the end-all, like the—the whole, you know, kind of point of conducting is to get on the podium and wave your arms, then you have kind of a limited, um, relationship with—with artistry in general. Um, I—I, I see that as—as an expression of—of a—of a much more kind of developed picture of musicianship. The—the, the—the act of getting on the podium and waving your arms is a beautiful thing in and of itself, but I think it's only poignant and meaningful in the context of a greater sense of purpose and—and a bigger life as—as an artist overall. You know what I mean? Like, that cannot be the finished point. That can't be the singular purpose in life. There—there—that—that has to be, you know, one way of expressing something that—that, um, relates to who you are as a—as a musician.
Michael Shapiro:
The one thing I noticed about you when I saw you conduct—guest conduct, very suddenly you came in to guest conduct the Minnesota Orchestra when we were in Minneapolis, was that you, like me, like the best in the business, I may add, because I've been around long enough I can say this, Teddy, it's—it's like life and death for you.
Michael Shapiro:
[Laughs] It is, it's blood and guts. You really want it to be as close as the—the composer had intended. And so let's talk about Mahler 6.
Teddy Abrams:
Oh.
Michael Shapiro:
You just climbed a mountain. You went to the Tyrol or the Alps, and you climbed a mountain with a stick all alone, and you got into the thinned air and you conducted Mahler 6. So, my first question is: Scherzo-Andante or Andante-Scherzo?
Teddy Abrams:
We did it with the, uh—the Scherzo second. Yeah, we did it the original. Yeah, and and, I'm not a, um, an ideologue about this. That—that just feels balanced to me. It also—it also seems like in terms of key structure—
Michael Shapiro:
I agree.
Teddy Abrams:
—that is what's called for, because if you look at the relationship of the end of the slow movement to the beginning of the last movement—
Michael Shapiro:
Fabulous.
Teddy Abrams:
—there—there's a particularly odd, you know, tritone relationship right there, that—that's—that's quite important in the—in the overarching counterpoint of the piece. Um, and you actually need to hear that tritone relationship for the—for the beginning of the last movement to make sense. It doesn't work if you come out of the—the Scherzo in the same way. But—but again, I'm not, um, a hardliner on the—on this stuff. I mean, I've—I've heard it both ways and—and if—I mean, if there are convincing performances, they're going to be convincing performances. But for me, structurally, the—the slow movement needs to sit in the—the position just before the last movement, and it—
Michael Shapiro:
And how many—how many death strokes?
Teddy Abrams:
We only do the two. We—we, we—we do that.
Michael Shapiro:
I love this. Bravo.
Teddy Abrams:
Yeah. And, you know, it's—it's—I think it actually is the right amount, because of course it was five originally, then three, and then two, um, but the, you know—it's, it's what, like, like any—I mean, it's not a gimmick. I don't want to say it's a gimmick, but—but of course, like Mahler, it's—it's a thing that he takes to a—to an extreme, and it—and it can—it can be, um, you know, comedic or gimmicky if it's—if it's not done well and—and, and with total commitment. And I think, like in comedy, two times just is off—off-putting and—and, and leaves you on guard, right? It's strange, and it leaves you wondering when the third time's going to come and then it doesn't. But three times is predictable.
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah, yeah, it's too much. Here's the composer in you talking, which I love. Now let's talk about study of phrasing in Mahler. There is no piano music. There's very little chamber music and nobody really knows it, the very early stuff. How did you learn to phrase Mahler, as opposed to this guy, as opposed to Haydn, as opposed to Beethoven, as opposed to Bartók, as opposed to anybody, Teddy Abrams?
Teddy Abrams:
That's—that's interesting. I had—I had not thought about phrasing Mahler differently from the way I look at—the, at all music. I mean, I, I, I think that there are—it—it might be less about the phrasing for me than the inflection that's—that's unique to Mahler. For me, with—the way—the way I think about phrasing in general, and—and this comes from a—a variety of teachers that I—that I had, um, is that you're—you're trying to conceive of the—the phrasing structure in the—the largest and longest possible terms. So, you're trying to think about, if this is a six-bar phrase, it's a five-bar phrase, it's a four-bar phrase—and there are many off-kilter, strange, you know, odd-numbered phrase—phrasings in, um—in Mahler in general, but in particular in the Sixth Symphony. You're—you're trying to think about, okay, if you are planning a destination from the beginning of the phrase to the last bit of the phrase, where can you peak in such a way that the phrase maintains its integrity and captures attention from beginning to end? And—and so much of the training that I got, especially at Curtis—this is a very Otto-Werner Mueller thing, who was my teacher there—is about getting to the last possible moment. And—and I think there's a lot of—of truth in that, that, that—that, that oftentimes people peak like in the first or second bar of a four-bar phrase, or a longer phrase, and while the music continues, the—the tension that pulls you into listening to that phrase recedes. And that's why—it's a little bit like people who drive by pressing on the gas and then releasing, and pressing on the gas and then releasing. You're—you're going forward, it's true, but you're doing it in a way that's—that's not terribly comfortable and doesn't feel like the driver understands—
Michael Shapiro:
Wow.
Teddy Abrams:
—um, what it takes to get to the next destination.
Michael Shapiro:
I had this conversation with Noah Bendix-Balgley, who's a friend of mine, who's concertmaster of the Berlin Philharmonic. And we were talking specifically because he wrote a klezmer concerto, which you probably know about.
Teddy Abrams:
Oh, yeah. It's, yeah, it's phenomenal.
Michael Shapiro:
Wonderful piece, with Sam Adler orchestrated. Now, Noah and I, and his father is a klezmer dancer, interestingly enough. My dad, Sam Shapiro, was a klezmer clarinetist. He studied with Dave Tarras, the great klezmer. And Crackow and I have had conversations about Dave Tarras and Sam Shapiro—aye-ya-ya. In any event, we were talking about, dee-da-da, dee-da-da, dee-da-da. Okay. Which you know, da-da-dee-da, right?
Teddy Abrams:
Yeah.
Michael Shapiro:
I've heard performances that do it, you know, without that organic quality that I think is essential to great music-making, no matter what it is. You're doing a Mozart 40, dee-a-ta, dee-a-ta, dee-a-ta-ta. I mean, how do you—other people, da-da-da-da-da-da. No, they're not getting it. Brahms's Second, dee-da-dee-da—you know, do they understand that luft? So, do you search organically? What is your process, so teaching the young conductors or young musicians now that may be watching? What is your process in finding the organic basis of every piece, whether it be this klezmer-induced Mahlerian angst or something else? Where are you finding it, Teddy?
Teddy Abrams:
I—I think it comes from whatever process you're going to use to study this music to a level where your expression of it is natural. And I think that, that—that's my goal in studying it, to feel like I have a compositional voice in the—in the production then of that piece. Like, I—I want to feel as close as possible to the sense that I wrote it. Not—not to say that I did write it and—and, and then, you know, have—have a certain ownership over it—not, not in a—an authoritarian way, I'm not talking about that—but I, I do want the feeling of authority that—that makes it feel like the expression is as free-flowing as if I'd improvised it or composed it myself.
Michael Shapiro:
Yeah, yeah.
Teddy Abrams:
And when—when you get to that point, which is very hard, I mean—and, and just being totally transparent, that, that—that's something of a rarity. I mean, that's—that's the peak right there, if you can get to a point of fluency with—with any piece of music, either as a performer or conductor, that you feel like you could have written it, it—it, it—it's suddenly a sense of like not being tethered to the ground anymore. You, you're—you're lifted off and you, you—you have this overview effect that you—that you get. Like, you can—it's almost like being in The Matrix, too, where you're not bound by the laws of gravity anymore. And—and, you know, I, there are—there are certain pieces where—where I've come, I think, close to that, and the act of performing it is a—is both a recreation and a creation process—
Michael Shapiro:
Bravo.
Teddy Abrams:
—as opposed to a recreation process exclusively, which is what it is for I think most people under most circumstances.
Michael Shapiro:
And what people don't understand is that you have to impart to that oboe player, to a full string section, how you want that moment to go, and where it's going, and, you know, not easy. And there are very few— Lenny used to talk about, you know, composing a piece of somebody else, of these guys, and he felt like he was composing it as he was conducting it. Certainly—
Teddy Abrams:
Yes, yes, yes, exactly. And—and, you know, of course, the other element to consider is that the stronger the orchestra, the more every individual player in that orchestra is also doing this simultaneously.
Michael Shapiro:
Right.
Teddy Abrams:
They're trying not to gunk up the system. They're actually trying to let them do that same thing and give them permission to—to do it to the greatest extent possible, while still, you know, making sure that the whole machine is building one thing, you know? And this is—this is the art of it. This is where it gets really, really complex. It both gets simpler and more complex, right, you know? You know what I mean?
Michael Shapiro:
Oh, totally, and what I love is having this kind of, what I call a totally nerd-out discussion. It's—it's wonderful, Teddy.
Teddy Abrams:
This might be a deep cut, I don't know, you know, for, for your average, you know—
Michael Shapiro:
No, it's great, because it's showing people really what the best of us is searching for, everybody should be searching for. For me, it's life and death, blood and guts, as I said before. But I want to talk about something else, which is your writing, because for me, as I say, kindred spirit, it's great that you are a composer, that you're a composer who wants to impart feeling in written notes, which then can be interpreted by someone else in ways that you may not even have realized. This happened to me, realized recently with my flute concerto recording I did with the Royal Philharmonic. I didn't know what the flutist was going to do, so he started to speed up certain things and come back to— I just went with him, because that's his interpretation, and it was so good—Stathis Karapanos. So, you know, when you have those moments— So, you have written several orchestral works, and you are—are right in the middle of workshopping, hopefully, a Broadway musical based on Louisville's greatest son, Muhammad Ali, who, I might mention, except for the first Liston fight, I saw every fight on TV, every one.
Teddy Abrams:
Wow.
Michael Shapiro:
With my brother, and we would watch them religiously because he was a great hero of ours, especially when he said, "I got nothing against them Viet Cong," you know, Vietnamese.
Teddy Abrams:
Yes, yes.
Michael Shapiro:
So, talk to me about how did you get the idea—I understand you're in Louisville, but how did you get the idea to write several versions, it seems, of an Ali musical to be?
Teddy Abrams:
So, the Ali musical that I'm writing right now is a totally new incarnation, um, of—of the—the work that I've been doing about Ali now for eight and a half years, basically. So, the original piece that I wrote is—is completely unrelated to—to the—the Broadway musical that's happening. Um, the Broadway musical is still a result of this original piece, but musically they—they are not connected. The original thing that I did, um, was what I call an immersive musical. Eh, it's a—it's a genre—I don't think I've invented it because it basically is oratorio; that's—that's, that's—that's its closest relative in—in real life—to kind of staged oratorios. Um, but I've done this now a couple of times with different subject matter. And, I'm—I'm interested in things that have significance historically or culturally, and finding a way to venerate and celebrate them on the orchestral stage, but in a more dramatic context than—than simply, you know, saying your—your big orchestral piece is about something and then, you know, leaving audiences to draw their own conclusions. And of course, this is exactly what composers like—like Handel were doing in—in their, you know, passion oratorios and—and, uh, you know, and, and Haydn and Mozart wrote along these lines, too, you know, but it was more, um, liturgical in nature. So I was really interested in this. I think also Bernstein does this in Mass, that it's—it's a—it's a combination of theater, of oratorio, and of, of pure music. And—and, so I—I, I hit upon this idea to tell Ali's story through that lens. So rather than—than having it be acted out in a—in a, um—in a purely theatrical sense, I was interested in, in, in creating a piece of music that uses Ali's own words, that uses the words of poets from three or four thousand years of history as a kind of Greek chorus, and then uses some light staging with a little bit of choreography, some video elements, things like that, to—to bring his story to life. But—but the music was center, that's why I called it a, you know, immersive music or, or, or an immersive musical, because it wasn't about putting the music in service to the theater, it was about bringing theatrical and, and, uh, you know, more, uh, kind of Gesamtkunstwerk elements to a—a musical primary form.
Michael Shapiro:
Ah, now here we go. I had a conversation with Steve Schwartz—I'm dropping names like crazy, but he's a buddy, and—and he, of course, wrote Wicked, and then before. And Wicked's still on Broadway.
Teddy Abrams:
And—and also worked on Mass, too, as a—you know, it's great.
Michael Shapiro:
He did, he wrote—and that's where I first met him. When Marin conducted the LA Phil, we went out to hear it. But the thing about Steve, I said to him, I said, I went to see Wicked with my stepson in March, and we were astounded that it was packed, this huge theater—this was a good seven, eight years ago. It's still running. And they're packing that theater every night. So, that's a tough nut to crack. I mean, I—I—I've written operas and symphonies, I don't get that crowd every night. That is amazing stuff. And you have to appeal to a certain kind of person that's going to pay that 150 bucks per ticket and go in there and fill those huge halls. So you, sir, are writing an— a— a— immersive play, musical play, for Broadway, which is not the Broadway of George M. Cohan with Cohan with things which were a lot cheaper. So talk about that challenge, it's got to be immense.
Teddy Abrams:
Well, and—and that's—that's what I mean, like, so this original piece that I wrote, that was an orchestral production. That was something for the local orchestra's main series, our Classics series. That—that was a limited, uh, production that was never intended to—to go to Broadway and run eight times a week for years, and then have multiple tours in—in different regions globally. That was not what that was. That—that was a—an art piece. I was really proud of it. I—I, I, I loved writing it. It allowed me to take, you know, ancient Greek poetry and—and ancient Chinese philosophy, and Sufi, uh, musical strands and mix that together with Ali's life. We had Rhiannon Giddens as one of the—the, the, the soloists. It was a—it was a such a fun project.
Michael Shapiro:
I bet. But how are you guys getting John and Jane Doe from Nebraska when they come to New York to come see this? Why should they?
Teddy Abrams:
That's—that's a totally new piece. So, what I'm writing for Broadway, yeah, has to have mass appeal, and—and it has to be influenced by the elements of popular music that—that serve as the engine for most Broadway today. I mean, most Broadway today is a mixture of the things that have made film music successful and the things that have made popular music successful in varying degrees. So, some will be more oriented towards one or the other. You still get, you know, some—some more classic kind of Broadway that—that veers towards the, you know, the—the, the, the big kind of classic Broadway, the big kind of classic Hollywood sound. That's less and less common. Most of it is—is, you know, driven by, uh, the energy that fuels popular music today. Now, that's a broad spectrum, of course, so you'll get things that are more R&B focused, things that are more, uh, you know, country focused, uh, things that—that, that—that maybe, um, you know, re—reference rock, um, which, which of course was extremely popular, you know, you know, 20, 30 years ago, but—but still has its moments. Anyway, the—the music that I'm using as the kind of generative influence for the Ali musical, primarily circulates around Black music that Ali would have, uh, listened to or understood or would have been the—the kind of soundtrack for his own life. So, as we're telling Ali's story, I'm reference—referencing things like, you know, soul and Motown, um, and, uh, you know, uh, uh, uh, funk, all the way through hip-hop in—in the '80s to '90s, which would have been the, you know, the—the kind of Black-oriented musical portrait of—of his own life. And I'm lucky that I have a great team of people, um, you know, who specialize in—in this kind of music, and it's also music that I've loved and played, uh, since I was a kid. You know, I—I fell in love with jazz and—and funk early on, and that was my entry point into—to, um—you know, improvisational technique and popular music. So, so I—I love this music, but—but this is music that is universally appealing, you know, it's—it's, it's universally understood, and—and, um, I think it does a great job of representing Ali's life. But, you know, it's weird as a classical composer to be, you know, squarely in that world. Usually, I dipped my foot into it compositionally, but now I'm squarely in it.
Michael Shapiro:
It's going to be interesting to see and—and to hear, frankly, um, because I know this market very, very well, and I grew up, you know, in the uh, in the '50s as a little kid, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and, you know, Strauss and all those guys, and—and Kander. You know, it was a different era, and now it's developed to something else. It's become a bit of a tourist attraction, and that is somehow Wicked just fit into it very, very well.
Teddy Abrams:
You can't predict these things, but that—that's one of the—the things. I mean, I think people know when they have something special, but also a lot of very special things have not gotten universal recognition, so it's—you—you, you have to do it for the love of the genre. And I do think musical theater is—it, you know, like, like this is—who, what's the point of trying to rank these things? But, when musical theater lands, it's the most extraordinary form for—for expression, actually for artistic expression. When—when the theatrical elements combine with the musical elements, um, combine with the storytelling, combine with the effects departments, I mean, there—there is nothing more spectacular than seeing great musical theater, because it, you know, it—it's like all the greatest things of Hollywood and all the greatest things of live musical performance—
Michael Shapiro:
I agree.
Teddy Abrams:
—combined, and it's—and it's real. But also, there's nothing more, you know, uh, disturbing and, uh, unfortunate than bad musical theater, too. Like the nadir is extremely low. It's—it's real—it can be incredibly banal.
Michael Shapiro:
So you're workshopping it now?
Teddy Abrams:
We're workshopping it. We— we do have an incredible team. What's so fascinating is that—that the team that the producer has put together is a combination of real, real Broadway veterans, people that have won tons of Tonys and—and, and, and they know this world inside and out and—and live and breathe Broadway, with people like me, who—who are doing this for the first time. Um, I mean, the skill set hopefully is very compatible with what I normally do, but I think one of the joys of working in this way is that you get a lot of people that are fresh and—and are, like, I'm coming into this world wide-eyed. I'm so excited at age 36, and now 37, to be entering a—a, you know, a part of the music world that's totally new to me.
Michael Shapiro:
That's great.
Teddy Abrams:
I mean, I know classical—I know the classical world. It's not to say that there aren't new wonders to be discovered, but like I know how the industry works, and—and the—and the industry is a little small, myopic, and—and, and limited. And this is like a brand-new universe that I've entered, and—and it's so fun. And, and I'm sure the Broadway people feel the same way, that like they—they have their own things that get tiring and—and exhausting, but it—for me, it's new, and it's—it's so—it's so cool to be a part of that.
Michael Shapiro:
There have been very few composers in history, very few, who understand how to write music for the theater. Meaning, I'm walking from here to here in an action in a se— a setting of some sort, and what— how can I make myself move in that so that the audience says, "Oh, I understand what's going on". This guy understood it perfectly; Beethoven did not. It's interesting, to use two great examples. Schubert wrote 10 Singspiels and quasi-operas, not done. Schubert—
Teddy Abrams:
Yes, Schubert could write wonderful, dramatic songs in and of themselves, but to make theater is different. I mean, one of—one of the things that I find so interesting is that even when you're firing on all cylinders and you have great melodic work and a great song structure, and—and you feel like you—you have a song that's really landing, if the song doesn't support the storytelling and doesn't tell the—the story in a way that gets the action from point A to point B by the end of the song, then it—it very well may be wasted time on—on the stage in context. And so—so much of what you're doing is combining all of the musical skill that you have with a sense for the—the drama and narrative, um, elements that—that, you know, you don't have to think about that when you're writing a song cycle for a singer and a pianist, but you do have to think about that all the time when you're—when you're dealing with the stage.
Michael Shapiro:
Again, I'm dropping names. Sondheim, who was very kind to me, said that he did not understand writing um, poetry set to art, you know, art songs. He didn't understand it. He could only understand writing a song in the context of a drama. They're separate—separate skills, they really are, and there have been very few people who could—who can do both, you know?
Teddy Abrams:
Well, and there are—there—there are very few people who've—who've gone back and forth in the world of Broadway specifically. Ob—obviously opera is a—is a totally different situation, although there—there are overlapping things, but—but Broadway is surprisingly lacking in people who've crossed over from the—from the classical world. Like, I'm—I'm on my own here. There— it's not like there are a lot of other, you know, um, world—and I'm not saying I'm world-renowned—but I'm saying of the world-renowned composers in the classical world, people like John Adams, Steve Reich, um, Philip Glass, uh, Andrew Norman, you know, of these people, there's—no one's writing for Broadway. And so there—there's—it's not that there's no compatibility, but it just doesn't happen. There's more of an overlap with film. You'll find these—these folks writing for film more often than you find them writing for Broadway. So, it's really interesting. I'm—I'm kind of alone in this—this world, and, uh, it—it—I, I love that—that, you know, slight, um, discomfort that comes from—from feeling a little like a pioneer, even though, of course, this is what Bernstein did and Blitzstein did—
Michael Shapiro:
Lenny did, Lenny did, but he came from it, too, and it was a different time. And you know, West Side originally was not a success, so it was the movie that really pushed it over. Uh, you know, I'm thrilled about this and I—I'm looking so forward to seeing, in previews, Ali on Broadway. Teddy Abrams, thank you for being on Interplay. It's been a joy.
Teddy Abrams:
Thank you so much for having me. What a—what a wonderful time to—to spend together and—and chat about so many different things. We covered a lot.
Michael Shapiro:
Well, we could talk for 10 more hours, and we will, over—over dinner. So, we'll figure it out. Thank you, Teddy, for joining me.
Teddy Abrams:
Thank you very much.
Michael Shapiro:
This is Michael Shapiro on Interplay: Conversations in Music. Thank you for joining us.